Appendix D — Python Development Workflow Checklist
This checklist provides a practical reference for setting up and maintaining Python projects of different scales. Choose the practices that match your project’s complexity and team size.
| Development Stage | Simple/Beginner Project | Intermediate/Large Project |
|---|---|---|
| Project Setup | ||
| Create project structure | ✅ Basic directory with code and tests | ✅ Full src layout with package under src/ |
| Initialize version control | ✅ git init and basic .gitignore |
✅ Advanced .gitignore with branch strategies |
| Add essential files | ✅ README.md | ✅ README.md, LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING.md |
| Environment Setup | ||
| Create virtual environment | ✅ python -m venv .venv |
✅ uv venv or containerized environment |
| Track dependencies | ✅ pip freeze > requirements.txt |
✅ requirements.in with pip-compile or uv pip compile |
| Install dependencies | ✅ pip install -r requirements.txt |
✅ pip-sync or uv pip sync |
| Code Quality | ||
| Formatting | ✅ Basic PEP 8 adherence | ✅ Automated with Ruff (ruff format) |
| Linting | ❌ or basic Flake8 | ✅ Ruff with multiple rule sets enabled |
| Type checking | ❌ or basic annotations | ✅ mypy with increasing strictness |
| Security scanning | ❌ | ✅ Bandit |
| Dead code detection | ❌ | ✅ Vulture |
| Testing | ||
| Unit tests | ✅ Basic pytest | ✅ Comprehensive pytest with fixtures |
| Test coverage | ❌ or basic | ✅ pytest-cov with coverage targets |
| Mocking | ❌ | ✅ pytest-mock for external dependencies |
| Integration tests | ❌ | ✅ For component interactions |
| Functional tests | ❌ | ✅ For key user workflows |
| Documentation | ||
| Code documentation | ✅ Basic docstrings | ✅ Comprehensive docstrings (Google/NumPy style) |
| API documentation | ✅ Generated with pydoc | ✅ MkDocs + mkdocstrings |
| User guides | ✅ Basic README usage examples | ✅ Comprehensive MkDocs site with tutorials |
| Version Control Practices | ||
| Commit frequency | ✅ Regular commits | ✅ Atomic, focused commits |
| Commit messages | ✅ Basic descriptive messages | ✅ Structured commit messages with context |
| Branching | ❌ or basic feature branches | ✅ Git-flow or trunk-based with feature branches |
| Code reviews | ❌ | ✅ Pull/Merge requests with review guidelines |
| Automation | ||
| Local automation | ❌ | ✅ pre-commit hooks |
| CI pipeline | ❌ or basic | ✅ GitHub Actions with matrix testing |
| CD pipeline | ❌ | ✅ Automated deployments/releases |
| Packaging & Distribution | ||
| Package configuration | ✅ Basic pyproject.toml |
✅ Comprehensive configuration with extras |
| Build system | ✅ Basic setuptools | ✅ Modern build with PEP 517 support |
| Release process | ✅ Manual versioning | ✅ Semantic versioning with automation |
| Publication | ❌ or manual PyPI upload | ✅ Automated PyPI deployment via CI |
| Maintenance | ||
| Dependency updates | ✅ Manual updates | ✅ Scheduled updates with dependabot |
| Security monitoring | ❌ | ✅ Vulnerability scanning |
| Performance profiling | ❌ | ✅ Regular profiling and benchmarking |
| User feedback channels | ❌ | ✅ Issue templates and contribution guidelines |
D.1 Project Progression Path
For projects that start simple but grow in complexity, follow this progression:
- Start with the essentials:
- Project structure and version control
- Virtual environment
- Basic testing
- Clear README
- Add code quality tools incrementally:
- First add Ruff for formatting and basic linting
- Then add mypy for critical modules
- Finally add security scanning
- Enhance testing as complexity increases:
- Add coverage reporting
- Implement mocking for external dependencies
- Add integration tests for component interactions
- Improve documentation with growth:
- Start with good docstrings from day one
- Transition to MkDocs when README becomes insufficient
- Generate API documentation from docstrings
- Automate processes as repetition increases:
- Add pre-commit hooks for local checks
- Implement CI for testing across environments
- Add CD when deployment becomes routine
Remember: Don’t overengineer! Choose the practices that add value to your specific project and team. It’s better to implement a few practices well than to poorly implement many.