Exercise 2 Prompts
Exercise 2: AI-Assisted Strategic Analysis
Prompt Templates & Examples
Use these prompts during Exercise 2 to practice the three AI strategic analysis techniques.
Recommended AI Tools: - Google Gemini (free, no login required) - ChatGPT (free tier available) - Claude (via claude.ai)
Pro Tip: Upload the RetailFlow Company Overview to your AI tool first to give it context about the case study.
TECHNIQUE 1: RISK DEEP-DIVE
Use AI to find threats and blind spots you might have overlooked
Basic Template:
I'm planning to [describe AI initiative]. What are 3-5 risks I might have overlooked?
Example Prompts:
Chatbot Risk Analysis:
I'm planning to deploy AI chatbots for customer service in retail.
What are 3 risks I might have overlooked?
Dynamic Pricing Risks:
We're implementing dynamic pricing AI in our retail stores.
What could go wrong that I haven't considered?
Using RetailFlow Context:
[Upload RetailFlow Company Overview first]
RetailFlow is considering AI inventory optimization ($1.1M investment).
What are 5 risks specific to a mid-sized retailer like RetailFlow that
might not be obvious from the ROI projections?
TECHNIQUE 2: REVERSE PROMPTING
Let AI interview YOU to reveal gaps in your thinking
Basic Template:
I'm evaluating [AI initiative]. Ask me [5-10] critical questions I should answer before investing.
Example Prompts:
General AI Investment Questions:
I need to evaluate an AI project for my organisation.
Ask me 5 critical questions I should answer before investing.
Specific Initiative Questions:
I'm considering AI inventory optimization for a retail chain.
What questions should I be asking before making this investment?
Using RetailFlow Context:
[Upload RetailFlow Company Overview first]
I'm the CEO of RetailFlow evaluating 4 AI investments: chatbots ($525K),
dynamic pricing ($1.3M), inventory optimization ($1.25M), and fraud detection ($1.05M).
Ask me 10 questions to determine which should be our priority, considering our
$2M budget constraint.
TECHNIQUE 3: AI DEBATE
Create a strategic debate to see multiple perspectives
VERSION A: Single AI, Both Sides (Easiest)
Basic Template:
Facilitate a strategic debate about [decision]:
**Role 1 (PRO):** Argues for [option A]. Present 3 compelling arguments.
**Role 2 (CON):** Argues for [option B]. Present 3 compelling arguments.
After presenting both sides, have each side rebut the other's strongest argument.
Example: Investment Decision
Facilitate a strategic debate about RetailFlow's AI investment decision:
**Chief Innovation Officer (PRO):**
Argues we should invest $850K in AI dynamic pricing NOW.
Present 3 compelling arguments for immediate action.
**Chief Financial Officer (CON):**
Argues we should wait 18 months before investing.
Present 3 compelling arguments for delaying investment.
After presenting both sides, have each executive rebut the other's strongest argument.
Example: Scale vs Kill Decision
Debate: Should we scale our AI chatbot pilot or kill the project?
**VP Customer Service (SCALE):**
The pilot showed 65% automation. Argue for full rollout. 3 reasons.
**CFO (KILL):**
ROI is only 119% over 3 years. Argue for killing it. 3 reasons.
Each side rebuts the other's top concern.
VERSION B: Two AIs Cross-Critique (Most Interactive)
Requires two different AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT + Claude)
Step 1 - Ask BOTH AIs the same question:
Should RetailFlow invest $1.3M in AI dynamic pricing now, or wait 18 months?
Present your recommendation with 3 supporting arguments.
Step 2 - Copy AI #1’s answer, paste into AI #2:
Another AI strategist gave this recommendation:
[PASTE AI #1's FULL ANSWER HERE]
Critique this recommendation. What are the 3 weakest points in their argument?
Step 3 (Optional) - Copy AI #2’s critique, paste into AI #1:
Another strategist critiqued my recommendation with these points:
[PASTE AI #2's CRITIQUE HERE]
Respond to these criticisms. Where is their critique wrong or incomplete?
VERSION C: Two AIs, Assigned Sides
AI #1 (ChatGPT) - PRO side:
Argue FOR investing $1.3M in AI dynamic pricing NOW.
Give 3 strong arguments supporting immediate investment.
AI #2 (Claude) - CON side:
Argue AGAINST investing in AI dynamic pricing now. Recommend waiting 18 months.
Give 3 strong arguments for delaying investment.
Then Cross-Critique (paste AI #1’s answer into AI #2):
Another strategist argued FOR immediate investment:
[PASTE AI #1's ANSWER]
Critique their arguments. What are the 3 weakest points?
RETAILFLOW-SPECIFIC PROMPTS
Use these with the RetailFlow case study context
Risk Deep-Dive for RetailFlow:
[Upload RetailFlow Company Overview]
RetailFlow (500 employees, $500M revenue, 75 stores) is considering AI chatbots
for customer service ($525K investment, 119% ROI).
What are 3-5 risks specific to mid-sized retail that we might overlook?
Reverse Prompting for RetailFlow:
[Upload RetailFlow Company Overview]
I'm the Investment Committee Chair at RetailFlow. We must allocate $2M across
4 AI projects: Chatbot (119% ROI, low risk), Pricing (150% ROI, ethical risk),
Inventory (163% ROI, exceeds budget), Fraud (169% ROI, 6-mo delay).
Ask me 7 questions to determine the optimal portfolio allocation.
AI Debate for RetailFlow:
[Upload RetailFlow Company Overview]
RetailFlow Investment Committee is split on AI fraud detection ($1.05M, 169% ROI):
**CIO (PRO):**
Argues fraud detection is critical despite 6-month data prep delay. 3 arguments.
**Chief Ethics Officer (CON):**
Argues ethical risks (bias) are too high. 3 arguments.
Each rebuts the other's top concern.
TIPS FOR EFFECTIVE PROMPTING
1. Provide Context
Upload the RetailFlow Company Overview or paste key facts: - Company size: 500 employees, $500M revenue, 75 stores - Budget constraint: $2M total for AI investments - Strategic priorities: Growth + operational efficiency
2. Be Specific
❌ “What about AI?” ✅ “What are 3 risks of deploying AI chatbots for customer service in retail?”
3. Ask for Structure
- “Give me 3-5 examples”
- “Present this as a pros/cons table”
- “Rank these by priority”
4. Iterate
- Start with a broad question
- Follow up: “Elaborate on point #2”
- Challenge: “What if our budget is cut in half?”
5. Use Multiple AIs
- Different AIs have different “personalities”
- ChatGPT: Balanced, comprehensive
- Claude: Detail-oriented, cautious
- Gemini: Creative, sometimes contrarian
EXERCISE WORKFLOW
During Exercise 2 (70 minutes):
- Individual Brainstorm (10 min):
- Identify threats and opportunities for RetailFlow
- Use your experience and intuition
- AI-Assisted Analysis (40 min):
- Risk Deep-Dive (15 min): Find blind spots
- Reverse Prompting (15 min): Let AI question your assumptions
- AI Debate (10 min): See multiple perspectives
- Synthesis (10 min):
- What did AI reveal that you missed?
- What did you catch that AI missed?
- How would you use AI + human judgment together?
- Group Discussion (10 min):
- Share insights with your table
- Discuss: When is AI helpful? When is human judgment critical?
KEY LEARNING
AI as Augmentation (not replacement): - ✅ AI finds blind spots you missed - ✅ AI generates alternatives quickly - ✅ AI challenges your assumptions
But: - ❌ AI doesn’t understand your organisation’s culture - ❌ AI lacks context about stakeholder politics - ❌ AI can’t make the final decision (you must)
Best practice: Human expertise + AI analysis = Better strategic decisions
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
- Strategic Prompting Guide - Full techniques reference
- RetailFlow Company Overview - Case study details
- AI Investment Checklist - Evaluation framework
Questions during the exercise? Ask your facilitator or experiment with different prompt variations!